Define your Universe
Select your Filters
Sort your
Results
Demo
Country
Europe
North America
Africa
Asia
Oceania
Middle East
South America
Central America
Capitalization (USD)
Investor
Revenue growth
Change as of January 1 (Relative)
P/E (Y+1)
Add filter
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator STIM, created by Franck Morel
EPS revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months.
Surprise rates
This rating is based on surprise rates from the last four completed fiscal periods. A surprise rate measures the difference between the consensus (average estimated value by the analysts covering the company) of an accounting item the day before publication and the actual value reported by the company on the publication day. A company that reports results above consensus receives a higher rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBIT, Net Income, and Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Price to Free Cash Flow
This rating is based on the ratio between the company's share price and the free cash flow per share generated by its activities, based on the past and analysts' estimates for the coming years. The lower the ratio, the better the rating.
SMA5
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 5-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 5-days SMA.
SMA20
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 20-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 20-days SMA.
SMA50
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 50-day simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 50-day SMA.
SMA100
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 100-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 100-days SMA.
Revenue revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Financial estimates divergence
This rating is based on the estimates made by analysts responsible for producing the company's financial forecasts at leading global financial institutions. The lower the dispersion in estimates for the accounting items to be published over the next three years, the higher the rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBITDA, EBIT, Pre-tax Income, Net Income, Earnings Per Share (EPS), and Dividend Per Share.
Analysts' Target price divergence
This rating is based on the target prices set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. While the average target price is typically presented, it's important to understand that several analysts provide their individual assessments. The lower the dispersion in these target price estimates, the higher the rating.
Analysts' target price evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 4 months.
Analysts' target price evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 12 months.
Target Price evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Extremely recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 7 days.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 4 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 12 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 7 days. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Extremely recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Payout Ratio
This rating is based on the projected average payout ratio (DPS / EPS) over the next two years. The higher this average level, the better the rating. It helps identify companies that distribute most of their profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. Conversely, it also highlights companies that retain the majority of their earnings for reinvestment.
ESG: Controversies
The ESG controversies score is calculated based on 23 ESG controversy topics. During the year, if a scandal occurs, the company involved is penalized and this affects their overall ESGC score and grading. The impact of the event may still be seen in the following year if there are new developments related to the negative event. For example, lawsuits, ongoing legislation disputes or fines. All new media materials are captured as the controversy progresses. The controversies score also addresses the market cap bias from which large cap companies suffer, as they attract more media attention than smaller cap companies.
Revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long term revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. A key characteristic for investors seeking companies with strong development potential.
EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's net earnings per share growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company can show strong EPS growth even if the EPS itself is negative. Use the Net Margin rating to filter out these cases if they are of no interest to you.
Long term EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's earnings per share (EPS) growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company may display strong EPS growth even if the actual EPS remains negative. Use the Net Margin rating as an additional filter if you wish to exclude such cases.
Balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long Term balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
FCF growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's FCF growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the cash flow growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
ROE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROE, the better the rating.
ROA
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROA over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROA, the better the rating.
ROCE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROCE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROCE, the better the rating.
EBIT Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's EBIT margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the EBIT margin, the better the rating.
Net Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's Net margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the Net margin, the better the rating.
EBITDA Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's EBITDA margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the EBITDA margin, the better the rating.
Dividend Yield
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's dividend yield over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the dividend yield, the better the rating.
CAPEX/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average CAPEX / Revenue ratio over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The lower is the average, the better the rating.
Leverage
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / EBITDA ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
Gearing
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / Equity ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
P/E
This rating is based on the average Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of the company for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the stock price on the date of the EPS publication is used. However, the following ratios are calculated based on the last known stock price and EPS estimates. The lower the average level, the better the rating.
PBR
This rating is based on the company's average Price-to-Book Ratio (PBR) over the last published fiscal year, the current year, and the upcoming year. For the last fiscal year, the share price and number of shares at the publication date are used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated using the latest known share price multiplied by the current number of shares. A lower average PBR results in a better rating.
EV/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Revenue (EV/Revenue) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/Revenue ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBITDA
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBITDA ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBIT
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBIT (EV/EBIT) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBIT ratio results in a better rating.
EV/FCF
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/FCF ratio results in a better rating.
Analysts' coverage
This rating is based on the number of estimates provided regarding the company's future business performance. A company followed by a larger number of analyst firms receives a higher rating. Naturally, the larger the company, the more analysts typically cover it.
Analysts' recommendations divergence
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate, hold, reduce, or sell shares). The rating reflects the level of divergence in analysts' opinions. A lower divergence of opinion results in a higher rating.
Analysts' buy/sell recommendations
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate (outperform), hold, reduce (underperform), or sell shares). The rating reflects the overall consensus among analysts and takes into account the number of recommendations received. A positive consensus expressed by a large number of analysts results in a higher rating.
Capital Intensity
This rating is based on the company's average CAPEX / EBITDA ratio over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The lower is the average, the better the rating.
Growth
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue growth, EPS growth and FCF growth ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Capital Efficiency
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the ROE, ROA and ROCE ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Profitability
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the EBITDA margin, EBIT margin and Net margin ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Financial Health
This composite rating is the result of an average of the Leverage and Gearing ratings. The company must be covered by both ratings for the calculation to be made.
Visibility
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Surprise rates, Analysts' Coverage, Financial Estimates Divergence, Analysts' Recommendations Divergence, and Analysts' Target Price Divergence. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Consensus
This intermediate composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the following ratings: Target Price Evolution (1 year), Target Price Evolution (4 months), Analysts' Target Price, Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (1 year), Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (4 months), and Analysts' buy/sell recommendations. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 6 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Financial revisions
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue revisions (1 year), Revenue revisions (4 months), EPS revisions (1 year), EPS revisions (4 months) ratings. The company must be covered by the four ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Equity Valuation
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the P/E, PBR and dividend yield ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Enterprise value
This intermediate composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, and EV/FCF ratings. The company must be covered by at least two of these three ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
Fundamentals
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Growth (Composite), Capital Efficiency (Composite), Profitability (Composite), Financial Health (Composite) and CAPEX/EBITDA ratings. The company must be covered by at least four of these five ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Global Valuation
This composite rating results from the average of the rankings based on the Equity Valuation (Composite) and Enterprise Valuation (Composite) ratings. The company must be covered by both ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Revenue revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
EPS revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Trader
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Analysts' target price
This rating is based on the distance (expressed as a percentage) between the company's latest known share price and the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. Naturally, a higher average target price relative to the current share price results in a better rating.
Target Price evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past month.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past month. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Very recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Capital Efficiency (Composite), Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite), and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Bollinger Spread
This rating is based on the width, at the current moment, between the lower and upper Bollinger Bands. Narrower bands compared to the norm result in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks whose price is currently trading in a low-volatility congestion zone without a clear direction. Conversely, a low rating indicates a recent widening of the bands and a price acceleration characterized by high volatility.
RSI
This rating is based on the value of the 14-day RSI technical indicator. A low RSI value results in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks that are "oversold" according to the indicator. Conversely, a low rating indicates a high RSI value and an "overbought" price. It should be noted that RSI signals are more reliable in a sideways market (range-bound phase) without extreme fluctuations.
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator STIM, created by Franck Morel
Unusual volumes
This rating is based on the stock's daily volumes. The volume of the most recent trading session is compared to a simple moving average of volumes. The higher the volume relative to this average, the higher the rating. This allows identification of stocks attracting renewed interest from investors and/or speculators.
ST Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the short-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
MT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the medium-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
LT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the long-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
ST_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum; particularly the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 12 months. The more the price has risen, and the more steadily this increase has occurred, the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and bearish the trend, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks that exhibit a strong and consistent near-term upward trend.
MT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 36 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent medium-term upward trend.
LT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 60 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent long-term upward trend.
Revenue revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months. In the short term, the 4-month revision rating is essential for assessing quick adjustments, which may result from quarterly announcements, strategic updates, or external shocks temporarily impacting the perception of future revenues.
Revenue revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
EPS revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
Volatility
This rating is simply based on the standard deviation of the stock's daily returns over the past 12 months. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. Lower volatility in returns results in a higher rating.
5 days variation
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance over the last 5 trading sessions. It mainly allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
Change as of January 1 (Relative)
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance since the beginning of the calendar year. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their price behavior over the current year. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
EPS revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
 | 3.39x | 2.92B | ||||
| 7.37x | 1.69B | ||||
| 8.46x | 4.19B | ||||
| 14.91x | 854M | ||||
| 14.67x | 4.81B | ||||
| 7.83x | 4.98B | ||||
| 26.74x | 356M | ||||
| 10.38x | 5.89B | ||||
| - | - | 968M | |||
| 28.32x | 6.51B | ||||
| 6.48x | 4.34B | ||||
| 12.09x | 472M | ||||
| 15.1x | 420M | ||||
| 14.04x | 20.73B | ||||
| 14.41x | 449M | ||||
| 25.32x | 1.01B | ||||
| 10.73x | 567M | ||||
| 10.54x | 497M | ||||
| 13.22x | 483M | ||||
| 13.16x | 2.26B | ||||
| 18.46x | 951M | ||||
| 16.77x | 265M | ||||
| 21.99x | 1.29B | ||||
| 7.33x | 3.19B | ||||
| 9.95x | 1.86B | ||||
| 9.18x | 1.1B | ||||
| 8.63x | 668M | ||||
| 7.98x | 149M | ||||
| 18x | 3.31B | ||||
| 17.07x | 388M | ||||
| 17.9x | 8.61B | ||||
| 17.65x | 384M | ||||
| 14.42x | 456M | ||||
| 13.98x | 784M | ||||
| 17.4x | 4.04B | ||||
| 8.49x | 219M | ||||
| 7.65x | 477M | ||||
| 9.44x | 674M | ||||
| 12.83x | 169B | ||||
| 14.49x | 265M | ||||
Categories
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator STIM, created by Franck Morel
EPS revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months.
Surprise rates
This rating is based on surprise rates from the last four completed fiscal periods. A surprise rate measures the difference between the consensus (average estimated value by the analysts covering the company) of an accounting item the day before publication and the actual value reported by the company on the publication day. A company that reports results above consensus receives a higher rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBIT, Net Income, and Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Price to Free Cash Flow
This rating is based on the ratio between the company's share price and the free cash flow per share generated by its activities, based on the past and analysts' estimates for the coming years. The lower the ratio, the better the rating.
SMA5
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 5-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 5-days SMA.
SMA20
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 20-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 20-days SMA.
SMA50
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 50-day simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 50-day SMA.
SMA100
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the 100-days simple moving average (SMA). A larger difference between the price and the SMA results in a higher rating. Conversely, the lower the price is relative to the SMA, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks whose price has significantly diverged from the 100-days SMA.
Revenue revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Financial estimates divergence
This rating is based on the estimates made by analysts responsible for producing the company's financial forecasts at leading global financial institutions. The lower the dispersion in estimates for the accounting items to be published over the next three years, the higher the rating. Accounting items considered include: Revenue, EBITDA, EBIT, Pre-tax Income, Net Income, Earnings Per Share (EPS), and Dividend Per Share.
Analysts' Target price divergence
This rating is based on the target prices set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. While the average target price is typically presented, it's important to understand that several analysts provide their individual assessments. The lower the dispersion in these target price estimates, the higher the rating.
Analysts' target price evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 4 months.
Analysts' target price evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 12 months.
Target Price evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Extremely recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past 7 days.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (4 months)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 4 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 year)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 12 months. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (7 days)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past 7 days. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Extremely recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Payout Ratio
This rating is based on the projected average payout ratio (DPS / EPS) over the next two years. The higher this average level, the better the rating. It helps identify companies that distribute most of their profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. Conversely, it also highlights companies that retain the majority of their earnings for reinvestment.
ESG: Controversies
The ESG controversies score is calculated based on 23 ESG controversy topics. During the year, if a scandal occurs, the company involved is penalized and this affects their overall ESGC score and grading. The impact of the event may still be seen in the following year if there are new developments related to the negative event. For example, lawsuits, ongoing legislation disputes or fines. All new media materials are captured as the controversy progresses. The controversies score also addresses the market cap bias from which large cap companies suffer, as they attract more media attention than smaller cap companies.
Revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long term revenue growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's revenue growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the sales growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. A key characteristic for investors seeking companies with strong development potential.
EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's net earnings per share growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company can show strong EPS growth even if the EPS itself is negative. Use the Net Margin rating to filter out these cases if they are of no interest to you.
Long term EPS growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's earnings per share (EPS) growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the EPS growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating. Please note that a company may display strong EPS growth even if the actual EPS remains negative. Use the Net Margin rating as an additional filter if you wish to exclude such cases.
Balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 6-year window (5 growth rates), taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
Long Term balance sheet growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency and improvement of the company's total book value growth over a 13-year window (12 growth rates), taking into account both the last 10 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the balance sheet growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
FCF growth
This rating is based on the strength, consistency, and improvement of the company's FCF growth over a 6-year window, taking into account both the last 3 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 3 years. The greater the cash flow growth is in terms of significance, consistency, and improvement, the better the rating.
ROE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROE, the better the rating.
ROA
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROA over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROA, the better the rating.
ROCE
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's ROCE over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the ROCE, the better the rating.
EBIT Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's EBIT margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the EBIT margin, the better the rating.
Net Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's Net margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the Net margin, the better the rating.
EBITDA Margin
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's EBITDA margin over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the EBITDA margin, the better the rating.
Dividend Yield
This rating is based on the level and consistency of the company's dividend yield over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The higher and more consistent the dividend yield, the better the rating.
CAPEX/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average CAPEX / Revenue ratio over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The lower is the average, the better the rating.
Leverage
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / EBITDA ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
Gearing
This rating is based on the company's average Net Debt / Equity ratio for the last published fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. The lower this level, the better the rating.
P/E
This rating is based on the average Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of the company for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the stock price on the date of the EPS publication is used. However, the following ratios are calculated based on the last known stock price and EPS estimates. The lower the average level, the better the rating.
PBR
This rating is based on the company's average Price-to-Book Ratio (PBR) over the last published fiscal year, the current year, and the upcoming year. For the last fiscal year, the share price and number of shares at the publication date are used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated using the latest known share price multiplied by the current number of shares. A lower average PBR results in a better rating.
EV/Revenue
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Revenue (EV/Revenue) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/Revenue ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBITDA
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBITDA ratio results in a better rating.
EV/EBIT
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to EBIT (EV/EBIT) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/EBIT ratio results in a better rating.
EV/FCF
This rating is based on the company's average Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) ratio for the last reported fiscal year, the current one, and the upcoming one. For the last fiscal year, the Enterprise Value as of the publication date is used. However, the subsequent ratios are calculated based on Enterprise Value estimates. A lower average EV/FCF ratio results in a better rating.
Analysts' coverage
This rating is based on the number of estimates provided regarding the company's future business performance. A company followed by a larger number of analyst firms receives a higher rating. Naturally, the larger the company, the more analysts typically cover it.
Analysts' recommendations divergence
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate, hold, reduce, or sell shares). The rating reflects the level of divergence in analysts' opinions. A lower divergence of opinion results in a higher rating.
Analysts' buy/sell recommendations
This rating is based on analysts' recommendations regarding the company (i.e., whether they advise to buy, accumulate (outperform), hold, reduce (underperform), or sell shares). The rating reflects the overall consensus among analysts and takes into account the number of recommendations received. A positive consensus expressed by a large number of analysts results in a higher rating.
Capital Intensity
This rating is based on the company's average CAPEX / EBITDA ratio over a 4-year window, taking into account both the last 2 completed financial years and the outlook for the next 2 years. The lower is the average, the better the rating.
Growth
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue growth, EPS growth and FCF growth ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Capital Efficiency
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the ROE, ROA and ROCE ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Profitability
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the EBITDA margin, EBIT margin and Net margin ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Financial Health
This composite rating is the result of an average of the Leverage and Gearing ratings. The company must be covered by both ratings for the calculation to be made.
Visibility
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Surprise rates, Analysts' Coverage, Financial Estimates Divergence, Analysts' Recommendations Divergence, and Analysts' Target Price Divergence. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Consensus
This intermediate composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the following ratings: Target Price Evolution (1 year), Target Price Evolution (4 months), Analysts' Target Price, Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (1 year), Analysts' Recommendations Evolution (4 months), and Analysts' buy/sell recommendations. The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 6 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Financial revisions
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Revenue revisions (1 year), Revenue revisions (4 months), EPS revisions (1 year), EPS revisions (4 months) ratings. The company must be covered by the four ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Equity Valuation
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the P/E, PBR and dividend yield ratings. If the company is covered by at least two of these three ratings, the calculation is performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Enterprise value
This intermediate composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, and EV/FCF ratings. The company must be covered by at least two of these three ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
Fundamentals
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings according to the Growth (Composite), Capital Efficiency (Composite), Profitability (Composite), Financial Health (Composite) and CAPEX/EBITDA ratings. The company must be covered by at least four of these five ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you read the associated descriptions carefully.
Global Valuation
This composite rating results from the average of the rankings based on the Equity Valuation (Composite) and Enterprise Valuation (Composite) ratings. The company must be covered by both ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Revenue revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's revenue estimates for the next three financial years. These target revenues are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, indicating increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward revisions may signal potential growth challenges or unfavorable market conditions. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
EPS revisions (1 month)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past month.
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Trader
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Global Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Analysts' target price
This rating is based on the distance (expressed as a percentage) between the company's latest known share price and the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. Naturally, a higher average target price relative to the current share price results in a better rating.
Target Price evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the average target price set by analysts responsible for evaluating the company at leading global financial institutions. The target price is a metric defined over a 12-month horizon and is subject to revisions. Naturally, any single analyst's updated estimate affects the average, so revisions to the average target price are frequent. Recent upward revisions lead to a higher rating. This rating focuses specifically on the evolution of target price estimates over the past month.
Analysts' recommendations evolution (1 month)
This rating is based on the changes in the analysts' recommendations rating over the past month. The goal is to identify companies for which the analysts' consensus has varied the most. Very recent positive revisions result in a higher rating.
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Capital Efficiency (Composite), Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite), and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Bollinger Spread
This rating is based on the width, at the current moment, between the lower and upper Bollinger Bands. Narrower bands compared to the norm result in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks whose price is currently trading in a low-volatility congestion zone without a clear direction. Conversely, a low rating indicates a recent widening of the bands and a price acceleration characterized by high volatility.
RSI
This rating is based on the value of the 14-day RSI technical indicator. A low RSI value results in a higher rating. Thus, by focusing on high ratings, one can identify stocks that are "oversold" according to the indicator. Conversely, a low rating indicates a high RSI value and an "overbought" price. It should be noted that RSI signals are more reliable in a sideways market (range-bound phase) without extreme fluctuations.
STIM
STIM rating is based on the ranking of the security in the panel studied according to the mathematical indicator STIM, created by Franck Morel
Unusual volumes
This rating is based on the stock's daily volumes. The volume of the most recent trading session is compared to a simple moving average of volumes. The higher the volume relative to this average, the higher the rating. This allows identification of stocks attracting renewed interest from investors and/or speculators.
ST Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the short-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
MT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the medium-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
LT Timing
This rating is based on the position of the most recent closing price relative to the long-term support and resistance levels. A price close to its support and far from its resistance results in a higher rating. Conversely, a price close to its resistance and far from its support results in a lower rating.
ST_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum; particularly the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 12 months. The more the price has risen, and the more steadily this increase has occurred, the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and bearish the trend, the lower the rating. This rating thus helps identify stocks that exhibit a strong and consistent near-term upward trend.
MT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 36 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent medium-term upward trend.
LT_AR
This rating is based on the analysis of the stock price's momentum, focusing on the direction and consistency of its movement over the past 60 months. The more the price has risen and the more steadily this ascent has occurred the higher the rating. Conversely, the more unstable and downward the trend, the lower the rating. This rating therefore helps identify stocks showing a strong and consistent long-term upward trend.
Revenue revisions (4 months)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 4 months. In the short term, the 4-month revision rating is essential for assessing quick adjustments, which may result from quarterly announcements, strategic updates, or external shocks temporarily impacting the perception of future revenues.
Revenue revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's revenue estimates for the next three fiscal years. These revenue targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, which reflect increased analyst confidence in the company's ability to generate higher future revenues, lead to a better rating. Conversely, downward revisions can signal potential growth issues or unfavorable market conditions. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
EPS revisions (1 year)
This rating is based on the evolution of the company's EPS estimates for the next three fiscal years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the financial outlook of the company at the world's largest financial institutions and may be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often reflecting improving profitability and sound operational management, lead to a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may signal concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. The focus here is on estimate revisions made over the last 12 months.
Volatility
This rating is simply based on the standard deviation of the stock's daily returns over the past 12 months. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. Lower volatility in returns results in a higher rating.
5 days variation
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance over the last 5 trading sessions. It mainly allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their recent price behavior. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
Change as of January 1 (Relative)
This rating is simply based on the stock's performance since the beginning of the calendar year. It primarily allows for relative filtering of stocks based on their price behavior over the current year. A higher relative performance results in a better rating.
EPS revisions (7 days)
This rating is based on changes in the company's earnings per share (EPS) estimates for the next three financial years. These EPS targets are set by analysts responsible for the company's financial outlook at leading global financial institutions and can be revised at any time. Recent positive revisions, often signaling growing profitability and effective operational management, result in a higher rating. Conversely, downward adjustments may indicate concerns about profitability or exceptional expenses. This rating specifically focuses on revisions made during the past 7 days.
Select your edition
All financial news and data tailored to specific country editions
MarketScreener is also available in this country: United States.
Switch edition
